Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12615/2025 of MAHENDRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12615 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12615 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.518 of 2025, under Section 70(2) of BNS and Section 5(g)/ 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Maurawa, District Unnao.
4. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the co-accused Suraj has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 26.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11578 of 2025.
5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
6. Considering and adopting the same reasoning as contained in para 6 of the order dated 26.11.2025 and the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 03.09.2025 and the criminal history, which are minor in nature, has been duly explained, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Mahendra be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mahendra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12615 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench