Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14902/2025 of DR. UMA GUPTA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. SHIKSHA ANUBHAG-6 LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14902 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 to 5. 2. In view of order being passed, issuance of notice to opposite party No.6 stands dispensed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14902 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 to 5.
2. In view of order being passed, issuance of notice to opposite party No.6 stands dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) By issuing a writ, order or direction, Mandamus the O.P. No.1 may be commanded to count the gazzetted services of the petitioner since 03.04.1979 to 08.11.1990 rendered in the Labour & Employment Department in continuity of the services rendered in Education Department since 09.11.1990 for pay fixation and other consequential benefits including retiral benefits.
(ii) By issuing a writ or order, in the nature of Opp. Parties may be commanded to make proper pay fixation since 1995 adding annual increments till 2005, granting arrears of time scale promotion from 27.08.2003 as per order of O.P. No.2 dated 02.12.2024, recalculating gratuity after proper pay fixation and releasing 10% gratuity along with interest on the 90% gratuity, since 31.05.2016 etc."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimal Kumar, Km. Vishwa Mohini Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dr. Uma Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Shiksha Anubhag-6 Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
in light of judgment in the case of Prakash Ranjan Kumar and others v. The State of Bihar and others [(2010) 11 PAT CK 0077], in case same is applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 14902 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench