Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14918/2025 of NAND LAL PRASAD Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. BAL VIKAS SEWA AND PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14918 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) Issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14918 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to strictly implement and comply with the Government Order dated 31.05.2016 (Annexure No.1) relating to entrustment of charge of District Programme Officer;
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and entrust the additional charge of District Programme Officer, District Sambhal, to the petitioner, being the senior-most eligible Bal Vikas Pariyojana Adhikari, in accordance with law;"
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same, in light of Government Order dated 31.05.2016, in case same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Nand Lal Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Bal Vikas Sewa And Pushtahar Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench