Allahabad High Court

NA528/1888/2025 of KAMLESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1888 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application has been filed with the following

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1888 of 2025

Court No. - 14

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the entire proceedings of the Crl. Case No. 105837 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 106 of 2024 u/s 316(2) B.N.S./ 406 I.P.C., P.S.- Vikas Nagar, District- Lucknow and summoning order dated 16.07.2025 as well as the charge-sheet dated 08.02.2025."

3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.

4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

5. In view of above, it is provided that applicant may move his discharge application through counsel within three weeks from today and, in case, any such application is filed, the same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashank Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kamlesh Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

6. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

7. With the above directions, this application is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Arpan NA528 No. 1888 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead