Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11191/2025 of ZULFEKAR AHMAD Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11191 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. As directed by this Court, respondents No.7 and 8 are present in Court. 3. Both the respondents have
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11191 of 2025
Court No. - 3
HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. As directed by this Court, respondents No.7 and 8 are present in Court.
3. Both the respondents have been questioned with regard to the inappropriate behaviour and actions undertaken by them, including the refusal to accept the notice sent by the High Court with regard to this writ petition.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents submits that the instructions received by him indicate a conflict between the petitioner and the respondent No.9. He further submits that it appears that respondent No.9 is the descendant of certain persons who were earlier the owners of the particular gata in question.
5. It is, however, very clear from the facts of the case that construction made by the petitioner has been demolished by respondents No.7 and 8 without there being any order of any Court and/or authority for carrying out the said demolition.
6. We, however, are of the view that this is a matter that is required to be looked into by the trial court where a civil suit bearing No.918 of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Dharmendra Kumar Yadav, Shraddha Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Zulfekar Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
2023 is already pending.
7. In light of the same, we direct the trial court to appoint a Commissioner, if such an application is made by the petitioner, and thereafter, act in accordance with law.
8. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
9. The presence of respondents No.7 and 8 is dispensed with. December 19, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 11191 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench