Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12587/2025 of KHUSHYAL @ KHASIHAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12587 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 161 of 2025, under sections 80(2), 85
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12587 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 161 of 2025, under sections 80(2), 85 BNS, Sections 3/4 D. P. Act, P.S. Umaribegumganj, District Gonda.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Smt Neelam Chauhan having similar allegations was enlarged on bail order dated 21.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 11279 of 2025. The applicant is the father in law. The statement of the victim was recorded and was a part of aforesaid bail application wherein she stated that the fire had occurred as the gas was kept open and none was around her.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the said statement, the applicant, who is the father in law aged about 60 years and nothing has been stated against him, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 29.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Khushyal @ Khasihal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Khushyal @ Khasihal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12587 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench