Allahabad High Court
WRIB/1206/2025 of SAWAN SINGH Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, LAKHIMPUR KHERI AND OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1206 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 3. 2. In the light of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents no. 4 to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - B No. - 1206 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 3.
2. In the light of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents no. 4 to 6, is dispensed with.
3. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 16.09.2025, wherein he has confirmed the order passed by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation dated 24.08.2024 remanding the matter back for adjudicating afresh to Assistant Consolidation Office-II.
4. It has been submitted that in the previous litigation also the matter has been remanded which after fresh adjudication to Consolidation Officer, the Settlement Officer, Consolidation by means of order dated 24.08.2024 was of the view that one of the essential aspect of the matter with regard to Guljahan as to whether she is a daughter of Imam Khan ought to have been decided by adducing evidence as the same has not been done by the Consolidation Officer, he has remanded the matter back.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Consolidation Officer had framed the issued on 03.01.2024, but I find that this issue was never adjudicated by him and in absence of any finding recorded by the Consolidation Officer, I do not find any infirmity in the order remanding Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Chourasia, Mohd. Kashif Rafi, Pankaj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sawan Singh .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Lakhimpur Kheri And Others .....Respondent(s)
the matter back for adjudicating afresh after obtaining requisite evidence. The order dated 24.08.2024 has also been confirmed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation.
6. Accordingly in the aforesaid circumstances, I do not find any infirmity in either of the order remanding the matter back for adjudication afresh. It is provided that the Consolidation Officer shall proceed to consider and decide the matter expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, in accordance with law, subject to the cooperation of the petitioner in the aforesaid proceedings.
7. Subject to the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. December 19, 2025 Muk WRIB No. 1206 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench