Allahabad High Court
A227/7389/2025 of RAKSHA RAM AND ANOTHER Vs SETTLEMENT OFFICER CONSOLIDATION, SHRAVASTI AND 6 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7389 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no. 1. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7389 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no. 1.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No.1- i.e. Settlement Officer Consolidation Shravasti to decide the Case Application for restoration dated 25.4.2013 filed by the petitioners in Appeal No. 1149 and 736 under Section 11(1) of the U.P. C.H. Act 'Sita Ram Vs. Lal Dei and others' and Ram Sanehi Vs. Sita Ram' as contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition , expeditiously within the time specified by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1- i.e. Settlement Officer Consolidation Shravasti is directed to make all endeavor to decide the Case Application for restoration dated 25.4.2013 filed by the petitioners in Appeal No. 1149 and 736 under Section 11(1) of the U.P. C.H. Act 'Sita Ram Vs. Lal Dei Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Afzal Hasan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Raksha Ram And Another .....Petitioner(s) Settlement Officer Consolidation, Shravasti And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
and others' and Ram Sanehi Vs. Sita Ram', expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Muk A227 No. 7389 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench