Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12707/2025 of RAMNATH @ RAJ KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12707 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.346 of 2025, under
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12707 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.346 of 2025, under Sections 331(4), 64, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS, Police Station Talgaon, District Sitapur.
3. In terms of the FIR,allegations were levelled by the informant aged about 35 years that the applicant had committed rape on her on various occasions and on 11.10.2025, when the applicant came and touched her inappropriately, she shouted and her husband came. In the statement under Section 180 of BNSS, the victim stated that for the last three months, physical relations were formed under threat. The medical on record, as shown by the learned A.G.A., does not corroborate any allegation.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the nature of the allegations coupled with the fact that a boundary dispute is going on in between the families of the applicant and the complainant and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 13.10.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramnath @ Raj Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Ramnath @ Raj Kumar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12707 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench