Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14934/2025 of SURYA BHAN SINGH AND 5 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY., IRRIGATION DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14934 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14934 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'Mandamus' commanding the respondents to decide the representation dated 13-01-2024 of the petitioners, contained in Annexure - 1 to the writ petition, expeditiously.

(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'Mandamus' commanding the respondents to grant pension to the petitioners after computing the entire service, including that spent on Part Time basis and adjust the pension paid to them under the New Pension Scheme."

3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file individual fresh representations before authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others [AIR 2019 SC 4390] and judgment of this Court in the case of Writ-A No. 731 of 2024, Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others, in case same are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.

4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Surya Bhan Singh And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy., Irrigation Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead