Allahabad High Court

NA529/103/2025 of SATYA PAL SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 103 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the court of Additional

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 103 of 2025

Court No. - 16

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

2. The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), District Balrampur to decide the Complaint Case no.1/25/24 (Satya Pal Singh vs. Deep Prakash Jaiswal) filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.

3. The aforesaid case of the applicant is pending since 11.11.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that under Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act, it is provided that every trial under this Section shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint. He has submitted that since long time, the case is pending without substantial progress.

4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed to adhere to the provisions of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Padum Nath Mishra, Ravindra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satya Pal Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

and accordingly expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to the parties.

5. This application stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Sachin NA529 No. 103 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead