Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12635/2025 of RAVI KASHYAP Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU .ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12635 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Rajesh Kumar Awasthi, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. The same is taken on
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12635 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Rajesh Kumar Awasthi, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. The same is taken on record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.464 of 2025, under Section 85, 80(2) of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Paraspur, District Gonda.
3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the daughter of the informant was married to the brother of the applicant six years ago. Subsequently, on account of non-payment of dowry, she was killed by the entire matrimonial family. The applicant is the brother-in-law having separate living. The cause of death, as per the postmortem report, was ante mortem injury, which are four in number which include contusions over left arm, right side face, left palm and lower chest and upper abdomen.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the applicant is the brother-in-law having separate living and no specific allegation against the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 16.11.2025 and the applicant has one criminal history of main offence, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amol Kumar Srivastava, Shivang Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Kashyap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru .Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ravi Kashyap be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12635 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench