Allahabad High Court
NA528/2195/2025 of VINOD KUMAR YADAV @ VINOD KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2195 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Ankur Yadav, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2195 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sri Ankur Yadav, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 3.12.2024 in Session Trial No.332 of 2025 (State vs. Vinod Kumar Yadav & ors) arising out of FIR No.313 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, P.S. mall, District Lucknow along with summoning order dated 21.2.2025 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.8 to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vineet Kumar Chaurasia, Abdul Ghaffar Ansari, Bhaiya Lal Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinod Kumar Yadav @ Vinod Kumar And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 19, 2025 Pks NA528 No. 2195 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench