Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14893/2025 of ATUL SHANKER SRIVASTAVA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY LUCKNOW AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14893 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs(s):- "(i) issue a writ,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14893 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs(s):- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent Commissioner, Food and Civil Supply, Lucknow to consider the claim of petitioner and pass appropriate order for grant of ad-hoc promotion of petitioner on the post of Supply Inspector;
ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the claim of petitioner for grant of promotion to the post of Supply Inspector in the light of Government Order dated 28.05.1997 within period stipulated by this Hon'ble Court;"
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same, in light of Government Order dated 28.05.1997, in case same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Atul Shanker Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supply Lucknow And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench