Allahabad High Court

A482/10468/2025 of MOHAMMAD OSAMA @ AZAD Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10468 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application is filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 28.2.2024 passed by the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10468 of 2025

Court No. - 14

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The present application is filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 28.2.2024 passed by the A.C.J.M., Sultanpur, in Criminal Case No.6861 of 2024 in State Vs. Shekhawat Husain, pending in the Court of A.C.J.M., Sultanpur as well as all the consequential proceedings arising from the charge sheet under Section 392, 411, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Amethi, District Sultanpur.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was implicated falsely in the present case as he was taken into custody by the police on 31.12.2023 when he was at his house, thereafter, charge sheet was submitted by the Investigating Officer on 28.2.2024 in the most mechanical manner, therefore, indulgence of this Court is necessary.

4. Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer of the applicant and submits that charge sheet has already been filed on 28.2.2024 and in case, wrong arrest was made by the police, then applicant is having appropriate remedy. He further submits that charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, defence of the applicant cannot be considered at this stage. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atiya Abid Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Osama @ Azad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

5. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant requested that present application may be disposed of with the liberty to file discharge application before the court below.

6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection.

7. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of the application as well as other relevant documents, the present application is disposed of with the liberty to the applicant to file discharge application and in case, any discharge application is filed, then same shall be decided, expeditiously, in accordance with the law. December 19, 2025 GauraV/- A482 No. 10468 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead