Allahabad High Court
ABAIL/1401/2025 of SOORYA NARAIN MISHRA AND ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1401 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. Present application has been filed seeking
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C.
No. - 1401 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. Present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.812 of 2020, under Sections 498A, 304B, 504 IPC & Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants argues that co-accused who are sister- in-law, brother-in-law and friend of father-in-law of the deceased have been granted anticipatory bail vide separate orders. The applicants herein father- in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased.
4. Learned AGA opposes the bail application.
5. Considering and adopting the same reasoning as contained in Para 4 of the bail order dated 21.11.2025, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicants Soorya Narain Mishra and Smt. Rambeti alias Badal be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till conclusion of trial on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of Court below concerned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aman Kumar Shrivastav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Soorya Narain Mishra And Another .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
with the following conditions:
(a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(d) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. December 19, 2025 nishant ABAIL No. 1401 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench