Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15079/2025 of RAM KEWAL Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15079 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 15079 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing of the Office Memorandum dated 04.06.2025 (Inquiry Committee) contained as a Annexure No.1 and as well as transfer Order dated 05.06.2025 contained as a Annexure No.2 and all consequential actions taken thereunder.
II. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding to the opposite parties to allow the petitioner continue on the said post where he was discharging his duty continuously before passing of the impugned order dated 05-06- 2025 in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that since he is facing a cardiac situation, the aforesaid representation is required to be considered.
4. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
5. The petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Shukla, Anand Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ram Kewal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench