Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14879/2025 of ROOPA MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14879 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) Issue a writ, order or
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14879 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the Opp. Parties to pay the Pension & Other retiral dues with all consequential benefits along with interest, forthwith."
3. It has been submitted that petitioner was initially appointed on 12.02.1983 on the post of Operator in Uptron India Ltd. and was subsequently regularized in Police Department some time in 2005. Thereafter, he superannuated on 31.10.2020 but retiral benefits have not been provided despite the fact that similarly situated person, viz., Jai Prakash Gupta has been provided such benefits.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before the authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same, looking to the fact that same benefits have been provided to similarly situated person, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Singh, Ashutosh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Roopa Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench