Allahabad High Court
A227/7371/2025 of SUNITA KUMARI Vs TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL JALALPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7371 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no. 1. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7371 of 2025
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no. 1.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent, is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the recall application dated 14.10.2023 expeditiously which is pending in Case No. 3479 of 2022 and Computrized Case No. T202204040203479 "Sunita Kumari Vs. Jayram" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending since 14.10.2023 as per Rule 34(7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 within 90 days or within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1- i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar is directed to make all endeavor to decide the recall application dated 14.10.2023 expeditiously which is pending in Case No. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambuj Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sunita Kumari .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Another .....Respondent(s)
3479 of 2022 and Computrized Case No. T202204040203479 "Sunita Kumari Vs. Jayram" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending since 14.10.2023 as per Rule 34(7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Muk A227 No. 7371 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench