Allahabad High Court

A483/1120/2025 of SEEDGROW AGRI GENETICS THRU. ITS PROP. NARENDER CHANDANA Vs THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1120 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the court concerned to decide

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1120 of 2025

Court No. - 16

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

2. The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the court concerned to decide Complaint Case No.86709 of 2022, Seedgrow Agri Gentics Vs. Mohd. Haleem, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow within a stipulated period as the same has been pending since 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that under Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act, it is provided that every trial under this Section shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint. He has submitted that since long time, the case is pending without substantial progress.

4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed to adhere to the provisions of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act and shall act accordingly and decide the aforesaid case expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the court concerned.

5. This application stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Irfan Khan, Abdur Rub Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Seedgrow Agri Genetics Thru. Its Prop. Narender Chandana .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead