A227/7412/2025 of KULDEEP KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS on 19 December 2025

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

2. In view of the proposed order, notice to the private respondents is dispensed with

3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of mutation application No.13050/2025, computerized case No.T202510430413050 titled as "Kuldeep Kumar VS. Gaon Sabha", under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, pending before respondent No.2 i.e.Tehsildar, Tehsil Mohammadi, District Kheri.

4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met if the aforesaid case is decided in a time bound manner.

6. Considering the fact that the said case has been filed in 2025 of which proceedings are underway and from the perusal of the petition, there is no disclosure of any extra ordinary circumstance as to why this Court should exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the trial court to decide the same expeditiously. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheerendra Kr. Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kuldeep Kumar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)

7. This Court is conscious of the fact that the trial court/competent authority are burdened to heavy dockets and in a routine manner directions cannot be passed to the trial court/competent authority to decide any particular case out of turn expeditiously. It is when some extra ordinary circumstance is made out only then it would be appropriate for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. There also liberty should be given to the petitioner to place his grievances before the trial court/competent authority who after looking into the urgency as well as dockets situation and pass appropriate orders to expedite the aforesaid matter. In the present case no such circumstances has been mentioned or made out requiring interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

8. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditiously disposal of the aforesaid case before the trial court/competent authority. In case, such application is moved within two weeks from today the trial court/competent authority shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within three weeks thereafter. In case, the trial court/competent authority is prima facie satisfied that a case for urgency is made out it shall pass suitable order thereupon in accordance with law.

9. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

10. With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 7412 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench