Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14817/2025 of MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. IRRIGATION DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14817 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14817 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "1. Issue writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties not providing grade pay 2800/-and advantage of the old pension scheme. In pursuance to judgment and order dated 03.12.2025 passed in Writ-A No.810 of 2024.
II. Issue writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opp. party to pay the grade pay 2800/- from the due date and petitioner may also provide old pension scheme to the petitioner counting the total length of service i.e. 01.02.1996 till 31.07.2025 (30) years in accordance with the old pension scheme with the consequences of the judgement in writ petition no.810 of 2024 dated 03.12.2025, in the interest of Justice."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before the competent authority. In case such a representation is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : O.P. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Manoj Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Irrigation Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
filed, the same is required to be decided expeditiously by authority concerned in light of aforesaid judgment dated 03.12.2025, in case the same is applicable, within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition stands finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 14817 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench