Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14868/2025 of RAKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14868 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1 and Sri Dwijendra Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 & 3. 2. The

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14868 of 2025

Court No. - 18

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1 and Sri Dwijendra Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 & 3.

2. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.3 to Privilege Leave Encashment amount along with interest to the petitioners, at the interest rate which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit."

3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Additional General Manager/Unit Head (M) ITI Limited, Mankapur, Gonda, U.P. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of eight weeks thereafter. The concerned authority shall also consider the aspect of interest on delayed payment.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Rakesh Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead