Allahabad High Court

A227/7472/2025 of SHANTI DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7472 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Saurabh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7472 of 2025

Court No. - 5

HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri Saurabh Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Colonelganj, Gonda, to decide Case No. 24008 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202508300524008) - Shantee Devi Vs. Gaon Sabha and Others, U/S 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Colonelganj, Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Colonelganj, Gonda, is directed to decide Case No. 24008 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202508300524008) - Shantee Devi Vs. Gaon Sabha and Others, U/S 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.

8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

December 19, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Tiwari, Piyush Kumar Giri, Priyam Mishra, Shailesh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Shanti Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead