Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14897/2025 of HARI KISHORE SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SOCIAL WELFARE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14897 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "Wherefore, it is very humbly
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14897 of 2025
Court No. - 18
HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "Wherefore, it is very humbly prayed before this Hon'ble Court that it may kindly be pleased to:
(i) Issue writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Party No.2 and 3 to re-fix the salary of the petitioner after giving benefits of selection grade, promotional pay Scale and salary of Head master thereafter pay areas to the petitioner.
(ii) Issue writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Party No.2 and 3 to pay interest @ 7% on arrears/delayed payment from Sep, 1994 till the actual payment is made to the petitioner."
3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court allows the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 Director, Social Welfare, Lucknow and he may be directed direct to consider and decide the same, within the time fixed by this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Katyayan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Hari Kishore Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Social Welfare Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 Director, Social Welfare, Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 15 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith.
December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14897 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench