Allahabad High Court

WRIA/15103/2025 of ARUN KUMAR NIGAM Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15103 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Kartikey Dubey, Advocate, on behalf of opposite parties no. 3 & 4 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15103 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Kartikey Dubey, Advocate, on behalf of opposite parties no. 3 & 4 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for the State, Sri Kartikey Dubey,learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 3 & 4 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the opposite parties to make the payment of salary to the petitioner as per 7th pay commission, which is being paid to the similarly situated employees of UPSIDA, with all consequential benefits." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 1/Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Industrial Development, Govt. of U.P., Lucknow and the opposite party no. 1 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Chandra Tewari, Gyan Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kartikey Dubey, Manoj Sahu Arun Kumar Nigam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Industrial Development Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)

objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 1/ Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Industrial Development, Govt. of U.P., Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 1 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 15103 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead