Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12716/2025 of TAUFEEK @ CHOTKAU Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12716 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0142 of 2025, under Section 64(1),
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12716 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0142 of 2025, under Section 64(1), 127(2), 115(2), 352 BNS, P.S. Harriya, District Balrampur.
3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled by the informant aged about 27 years that when the victim had gone out of home, the applicant misbehaved with her, touched her inappropriately and also committed wrong on her. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS, the victim stated that she was taken on a motorcycle to his home and thereafter, wrong was committed. Before the medical authorities, the victim stated that as nothing had happened to her, she refused to undergo medical authorities.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the age of the victim, the huge variance in the statement and the refusal to undergo medical examination, the applicant who is in custody since 18.11.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Taufeek @ Chotkau be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Areeb Siddiqui, Mohammad Talib Khan, Mohd. Kashif Rafi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Taufeek @ Chotkau .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12716 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench