Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15110/2025 of TANVEER KHAN AND 6 OTHERS Vs U.O.I. THRU. SECY. HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI AND 6 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15110 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for opposite party No.1, learned State Counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 & 4 to 7 and Mr. Puneet Chandra, learned
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 15110 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for opposite party No.1, learned State Counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 & 4 to 7 and Mr. Puneet Chandra, learned counsel for opposite party No.3.
2. Learned counsel for petitioners is granted liberty to amend prayer clause of the petition during the course of day.
3. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "iv. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to pay the outstanding honorarium/salary of the petitioners for the period they have discharged their duties extending the benefit of judgment and order dated 20.03.2024 (contained in Annexure No.1) passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ- A No. 1453 of 2014 (Shiv Pratap Maurya Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.)."
4. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before the authority concerned, who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment rendered in the case of Shiv Pratap Maurya (supra), in case it is applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aashish Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Puneet Chandra (Manish Mathur,J.) Tanveer Khan And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Health And Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench