Allahabad High Court
BAIL/12735/2025 of AMIT KUMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12735 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Deo Raj Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12735 of 2025
Court No. - 12
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Deo Raj Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.324 of 2025, under Section 127(2), 64(1) & 351(3) BNS, P.S. Bheera, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled that daughter of the informant aged about 20 years was standing in front of her home when the applicant called her on the pretext that her mother was calling her and when the victim went there, he proposed to marry her which was refused and thereafter, wrong was committed.
4. In the bail rejection order, statement of the victim under Section 183 BNSS was considered wherein she stated that when the wrong was committed, her mother and father came and saw the incident and took her home. Medical on record does not record any allegation of use of force.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the statement under Section 183 BNSS and the medical not corroborating any allegation, the applicant who is in custody since 30.08.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Amit Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Munni Lal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12735 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench