Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15147/2025 of SMT.GANGA DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15147 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, learned counsel for the District Basic Education Officer and
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15147 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, learned counsel for the District Basic Education Officer and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opp. parties directing thereby to provide the family pension to the petitioner on the basis of representation dated 21.2.2025 sent by petitioner to opp. Partyno.3 regarding family pension as contained in Annexure no.1 to this writ petition." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all her claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/ District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri within the period of 15 days Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghanshyam Yadav, Shreya Shekhar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Net Ram Smt.Ganga Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 15147 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench