Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15191/2025 of CHANDRABHAN SHUKLA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT., LUCKNOW AND 4 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15191 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vijay Vikram Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Alok Sharma, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 5 and
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15191 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vijay Vikram Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Alok Sharma, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 5 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly, the opposite party No.3 to calculate and pay the gratuity of the petitioner w.e.f. 13.2.2009, the date of regularization of the petitioner on the post of Junior Engineer in place of 22.10.2013 along with prevalent rate of interest till it is actually paid to the petitioner. Issue any other writ, direction or order as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the favour of the petitioner.
III. Award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Alok Sharma Chandrabhan Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Public Works Deptt., Lucknow And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
2/Managing Director, U.P. Rajya Nirman Sahkari Sangh Ltd., Lucknow, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 15191 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench