Allahabad High Court

WRIA/15024/2025 of IQBAL ALI KHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15024 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Ms. Divya Dwivedi Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 15024 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Ms. Divya Dwivedi Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.

2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "(1) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding directing the opposite parties especially opposite party no.

regularized the petitioner w.e.f. 6.7.1997 when the service of the petitioner has been declared as permanent, in the interest of justice.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties particularly opposite party Consolidation Commissioner U.P. Lucknow to grant promotion to petitioner on the post of Assistant Consolidation Officer from the post of Consolidator as the junior person to the petitioner has been promoted on the post of Assistant consolidation offer from the post of consolidator by the opposite party Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra, Anand Kumar, Anubhav Awasthi, Mayank Mohan Mishra, Piyush Tripathi, Rakesh Khanna Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Iqbal Ali Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

no. 2, in the interest of justice."

3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

4. The petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 15024 of 2025

(Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead