Allahabad High Court

BAIL/12749/2025 of SAMEER @ BABLU Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. LKO. on 19 December 2025

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12749 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.267 of 2025, under Section 108 BNS,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12749 of 2025

Court No. - 12

HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.267 of 2025, under Section 108 BNS, P.S. Singahi, District Lakhimpur Kheri.

3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled that son of the informant was married to the sister of the applicant. Subsequently, his son had seen the sister of the applicant in a compromising position with someone and he was beaten up and thereafter, he committed suicide. Cause of death as per the postmortem report is antemortem hanging and apart from the ligature mark, three other injuries were observed. The applicant is being prosecuted for the offence under Section 108 BNS.

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

5. Considering the postmortem report and there being nothing against the applicant to suggest abetment as defined under the BNS and considering the law as explained in the case of Mariano Anto Bruno and Anr. v. Inspector of Police; 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1387, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

6. Let the applicant Sameer @ Babbu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Awasthi, Azmi Yousuf Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sameer @ Babbu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)

each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 19, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12749 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead