Allahabad High Court
WRIA/15146/2025 of SUBHASH CHANDRA PANDEY AND 8 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15146 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ in the nature of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 15146 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding to opposite parties to include the petitioner's name in the correct seniority list by granting him his due seniority in accordance with Law and also consider the petitioner for promotion/appointment to the post of Nayab Tehsildar.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus not to give effect letter No.G582/4-12E/2025 dated 10.07.2025 issued by Board of Revenue.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding thereby directing the opposite parties to prepare a fresh list strictly in accordance with law, in the interest of justice."
3. Ms. Parul Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection regarding entertainability of this petition in view of the fact that petitioner has neither challenged the letter dated 10.07.2025 nor added any effected party as opposite party.
4. In view of such objections being raised, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Niwas Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Subhash Chandra Pandey And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
petition.
5. In view of such submissions, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file a fresh petition. December 19, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 15146 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench