Allahabad High Court

WRIA/15128/2025 of VIMLESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. NAGAR VIKAS LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 19 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15128 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for respondent No.2. With the consent of learned counsel

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15128 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Shri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for respondent No.2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. The petitioner claims to have retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.07.2024 from the post of Runner. The petitioner before this court is claiming his retiral dues. As the matter pertains to payment of retiral dues, which claim is to be considered by respondent No.4 i.e. Chief Accountant Officer, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4 i.e. Chief Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, Sachin Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Kapoor Vimlesh Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

Accountant Officer, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow to decide the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law under relevant rules. Such a consideration shall be done within a period of six weeks, provided there is no legal impediment. In case the petitioner is entitled to be paid retiral dues, such payment would be made within next four weeks, provided there is no legal impediment. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 15128 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead