Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14841/2025 of MOHAMMAD AKRAM SIDDEEQUE Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14841 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14841 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties to provide all consequential benefits to petitioner as per his seniority provided in final seniority list dated 28-11-2025 as Assistant Prosecution Officer (A.P.O.).
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the opposite parties to provide relaxation in the eligibility criteria of having minimum period of seven years of service as Assistant Prosecution Officer for promotion of next higher post required under the Uttar Pradesh Prosecution Officer (Second Amendment) Service Rules, 2009....."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mohammad Akram Siddeeque .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition stands finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 14841 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench