Allahabad High Court
CMRA/161/2025 of RAKESH MAURYA AND 8 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO. AND 6 OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 161 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. This review petition has been filed in relation to order dated 17.11.2025 passed by this Court in PIL No. 1172 of 2025, wherein
.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 161 of 2025
Chief Justice's Court
HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This review petition has been filed in relation to order dated 17.11.2025 passed by this Court in PIL No. 1172 of 2025, wherein on noticing the contention that the proposal (Annexure No. 1 to the petition) was bearing forged signatures of the petitioner No. 1 in the petition, the Court observed that for the allegations made, filing of the PIL was not the remedy and consequently, dismissed the petition.
2. The review petition has been filed with the submissions that besides the fact that the signatures on the proposal of petitioner No. 1 was forged, other grounds were also raised, however, the same were not taken into consideration and therefore, the order requires review.
3. Having heard counsel for the petitioner, we are of the opinion that once allegation in the petition pertains to some forgery having been committed by the respondents, filing of the petition by raising other grounds without taking any steps qua the alleged forgery, the petition was found to be not maintainable. Admittedly, even now, no action has been taken qua the alleged forgery by the respondents. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Desh Mitra Anand, Vikrant Raghuvanshi . Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Rakesh Maurya and 8 others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. through Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Panchayati Raj Lko. and 6 others .....Opposite Party(s)
4. In view thereof, we do not find any reason to entertain the present review petition, the same is, therefore, dismissed. December 19, 2025 Harshita/Mukesh Pal CMRA No. 161 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench