Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11721/2025 of AJAY SINGH @ AJAY KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 19 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11721 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard Sri Mayanker Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. In view of order proposed to be passed,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11721 of 2025
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard Sri Mayanker Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the opposite party No.4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. This petition has been filed seeking following main relief:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned FIR dated 20.11.2025 having FIR No.276 of 2025, under Sections 191(1), 191(2), 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 74 and 125 of B.N.S. lodged at Police Station - Fatanpur, District - Pratapgarh, contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition, in the interest of Justice."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has wrongly and falsely been implicated in the impugned F.I.R. He further submits that only allegation against the petitioner is of conspiracy, whereas no Section in regard to the same has been invoked. Thus, the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no offence against the petitioner is made out.
5. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions, does not dispute the aforesaid contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghvendra Mani Ojha, Mayankar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
Page 1 of 2
allegation against the petitioner is of conspiracy and no section of B.N.S. in this regard has been invoked. He further submits that in the investigation, till date, no complicity of the petitioner has been found, however, the investigation is going on.
6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and the facts and circumstances of impugned F.I.R., per which the allegations against the petitioner is only to hatch the conspiracy to commit the offence, therefore, respondents No.1 to 3 are directed not to take any coercive action against the petitioner till any credible evidence of commissioning of offence emerged out against him. Needless to say that petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 29.12.2025 at 11:00 AM sharp for the purpose to get his statement recorded and also as and when he is called. In case of non co-operation in the investigation, the interim order granted to the petitioner shall automatically stands discharged.
7. With the aforesaid, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
December 19, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 11721 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…