Allahabad High Court

NA528/1882/2025 of DURGESH DIXIT Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER on 19 December 2025

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1882 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1882 of 2025

Court No. - 14

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 3.. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned charge-sheet dated 24.04.2025 arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 37 of 2025 u/s 115(2), 131, 351(3), 324(4), 333, 117(2) B.N.S., P.S. Shivratanganj, District- Amethi and summoning order dated 11.09.2025 includingthe proceedings of Crl. Case No. 19117 of 2025."

4. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.

5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

6. In view of above, it is provided that applicant may move his discharge application through counsel within three weeks from Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anumesh Mishra, Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Durgesh Dixit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

Page 1 of 2

today and, in case, any such application is filed, the same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.

7. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the discharge application, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

8. With the above directions, this application is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Arpan NA528 No. 1882 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead