Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11784/2025 of SHIV PYARI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 7 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11784 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the State- respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11784 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the State- respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner and to ensure the fair and speedy investigation of Case Crime No. 0352 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2025 at Police Station-Krishnanagar, District Lucknow.
3. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Ajit Kumar Sing, Sub Inspector, Police Station Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow, states that subsequent to the lodging of the FIR No 0352 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2025 at Police Station-Krishnanagar, District Lucknow the matter was investigated and charge sheet dated 27.7.2025 has been filed against one accused namely Surya Yadav while the name of other accused namely Anuj Yadav has been dropped. The aforesaid statement has been recorded.
4. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) December 18, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Utkarsh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Shiv Pyari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench