Allahabad High Court

WRIA/14726/2025 of DURGESH KUMAR SINGH (PNO-962310042) Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14726 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State counsel for opposite parties no.1,2 & 4 and Mr. R. K. Upadhyay, learned counsel for opposite party no.3. 2. The present petition has

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

WRIT - A No. - 14726 of 2025

Court No. - 7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State counsel for opposite parties no.1,2 & 4 and Mr. R. K. Upadhyay, learned counsel for opposite party no.3.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to treat the Censure Entry recorded in the character roll of the petitioner vide order no.DA-23/2013 dated 12.09.2013 passed by the Superintendent of Police, Shravasti for the year 2013 in respect of which it has been recorded and it may not be treated and recorded for the year 2026 in the interest of justice.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Deputy Superintendent of police ignoring the censure entry recorded in the character roll of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Om Prakash Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya) Durgesh Kumar Singh (Pno-962310042) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)

petitioner vide order dated 12.09.2013 passed by Superintendent of Police Shravasti in the interest of justice."

3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 18, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14726 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead