Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14752/2025 of DEEPA DEVI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AND NUTRITION LKO. AND 5 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14752 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 5. 2. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.6 stand dispensed with. 3.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 14752 of 2025
Court No. - 7
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 5.
2. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.6 stand dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the opp. party no. 3 to conduct the inquiry of forge handicapped certificate as the appointment of the opp. party no. 6 on the basis of aforesaid forge handicapped certificate on the post of Aganbadi Karyakarti at Mastipur Khalifa, Village Sahijana, H/o Mastipur Khalifa, District- Hardoi. ...."
4. Learned State counsel has been provided written instructions dated 11.12.2025, a copy of which is taken on record and as per which inquiry with regard to handicapped of opposite party no.6 was held twice and it was established that she suffers from disability of more than 40% as has been Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Kumar Bajpai, Ajit Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Deepa Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Child Development Services And Nutrition Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
certified by appropriate authority. The instruction also indicates that despite the aforesaid affirmation, petitioner is repeatedly filed filing applications.
5. In view of aforesaid instructions, it being established that disability of opposite party no.6 has been established in an inquiry, nothing more remains to be adjudicated upon in this petition, which is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. December 18, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14752 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench