Allahabad High Court
WRIC/12201/2025 of SONMATI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12201 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Vinay Pratap Singh Rathore, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.3 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12201 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Vinay Pratap Singh Rathore, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.3 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and learned counsel for respondent no.3. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers :-
i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 3 to adhere the decision taken by the final authority that is District Magistrate Basti in its meeting held on dated 11.02.2020 at item no. 19 regarding the claim amount of the petitioner and pay the all dues amount to the petitioner in the interest of justice.
ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 3, to consider and take a decision on application. dated 13.01.2025 regarding the claim of the petitioner on merit as per guideline and eligibility given in the government order dated 14.09.2016 as contained as Annexure no. 1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice.
iii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the opposite parties to immediately grant the benefits admissible to the petitioner with penalty 1,000/- per weeks from the date of repudiation in the terms and conditions given in the agreement dated 14.09.2016 under the 'Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojana'. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naresh Singh, Rajjan Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Govind Chaturvedi Sonmati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
not want to press this petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. December 18, 2025 Ashish Dewal WRIC No. 12201 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench