Allahabad High Court
CRLP/4310/2024 of ANKIT BAJPAI Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4310 of 2024 Along with : 1. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 4291 of 2024: Smt. Krishna Bajpai Alias Krishna Devi and others Versus State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Govt. of U.P. Lko and others Court No. - 10 HON'BLE
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4310 of 2024
Along with :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 4291 of 2024: Smt. Krishna Bajpai Alias Krishna Devi and others Versus State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Govt. of U.P. Lko and others Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Case called out. None is present for the petitioner to press the petition, whereas Ms.Shraddha Tripathi, learned counsel for the private respondent and learned AGA are present. There is no request for pass over or adjournment of the case.
2. On the last date also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the following order was passed on 08.12.2025:- "1. Case called out.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the aforesaid petitions nor any request for adjournment or pass-over has been made whereas learned Sri Utkarsh Mishra holding brief of Ms. Shradha Tripathi, learned counsel for the private respondent and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 submits that the mediation in the matter has failed.
4. List in the next cause list.
5. In case the learned counsel for the petitioners is not present on the next date, the appropriate order shall be passed."
3. In view of above, it appears that either the petitioner is not interested in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Diwakar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Shraddha Tripathi Ankit Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
pursuing the matter or it has rendered infructuous.
4. Dismissed accordingly. December 18, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 4310 of 2024 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench