Allahabad High Court

WRIC/12028/2025 of GAJRAJ Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12028 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of the State-Respondents. This writ petition has been filed by

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 12028 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of the State-Respondents. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayers : "(i) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no.2 and 3 to restrain the opposite party no.5 to 7 from harvesting the crop from the land Gata No.562 Minjumla, area admeasured 0.3540 hectare situated at Naya Gaon, Pargana Mallawan, Tehsil Bilgram, District Hardoi and take action against the opposite parties no.5 to 7 and accused persons.

(ii) . To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no. 2 and 3 to decide the application dated 13.10.2025, contained as Annexure No.3 to this writ petition, expeditiously within time period fixed by this Hon'ble Court." This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is the Gram Pradhan of Village Naya Gaon, Gausganj, District Hardoi, in his personal capacity. A preliminary objection has been raised by Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel contending that the Gaon Sabha has not been impleaded as a party. It has also been stated that an interim order is operating in the revision pending before the Board of Revenue. The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. December 18, 2025 Mahesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mata Prasad Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Gajraj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead