Allahabad High Court

SAPLD/545/2017 of SMT. REETA YADAV AND ORS. Vs SMT. CHANDRAKALI AND ORS. on 18 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 545 of 2017 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Case called out in the revised call. 2. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant(s) to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case. 3.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

LUCKNOW

SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 545 of 2017

Court No. - 19

HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Case called out in the revised call.

2. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant(s) to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.

3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. December 18, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ajay Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anita Singh, Suman Lata (Prashant Kumar,J.) Smt. Reeta Yadav And Ors. .....Appellant(s) Smt. Chandrakali And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead