Allahabad High Court
A482/10732/2025 of ASHISH KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10732 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Narendra Kumar Sharma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10732 of 2025
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sri Narendra Kumar Sharma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case no. 20862/2025, State Versus Ashish Kumar and others pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -lind, Lucknow, arising out of case crime no. 387/2023, Under sections 498A,323,504,506, I.P.C. and section 3/4 D.P. Act at P.S. Indira Nagar, Lucknow as well as chargesheet no. 01 dated 10.06.2024 and summoning order dated 04.03.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IInd, Lucknow on the terms of compromise dated 10-12.2025, in the interest of justice."
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ekramul Hasan Siddiqui, Vivek Pratap Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ashish Kumar And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 18, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 10732 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench