Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11853/2025 of RAKESH YADAV Vs U.O.I. THRU. DIRECTOR INFORCEMENT DEPTT. OF REVENGE MINISTRY OF FINANCE NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11853 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner , learned AGA for respondent no.2, and Ms. Nidhi Navi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rohit Tripathi,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11853 of 2025
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner , learned AGA for respondent no.2, and Ms. Nidhi Navi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rohit Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 3.
2. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the learned Court having jurisdiction/authority concerned to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of direction issued by this Court in Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 20172 of 2023 Inre; Prakash Chandra Tiwari Vs. Union of India and Ors.
4. There is consensus at bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by an order of this Court dated 20.03.2025 passed in Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 1734 of 2025 Inre; Jhakdi Sahu Vs. Joint Director of Enforcement and Ors, whereby the similar writ petition filed before this Court praying for similar reliefs had been disposed of permitting the petitioner to raise his claim before the Special Court of Anti Corruption C.B.I (West), Lucknow in accordance with law and the learned Court has been directed to consider the same after hearing all the parties concerned in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Kannojeya, Awaneesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rohit Tripathi, G.A. Rakesh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Director Inforcement Deptt. Of Revenge Ministry Of Finance New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to raise his claim before the Special Court of Anti Corruption C.B.I (West), Lucknow in accordance with law which Court shall proceed to consider the same after hearing all the parties concerned in accordance with law. December 18, 2025 A. Katiyar CRLP No. 11853 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench