Allahabad High Court
WRIC/11641/2025 of SHREE RAM Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND 2 OTHERS on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11641 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 11641 of 2025
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondents.
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite party no.2/ District Magistrate/Chairman, District Level Committee, Mukyamantri Krishak Durghatana Kalyan Yojna, District Barabanki, to take appropriate decision on representation dated 20.11.2020 and 10.02.2022 (Annexure no.1 & 2) within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
(ii) Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner in the interest of justice.
(iii) Allow the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner."
3. We have gone through the representations of the petitioner. The petitioner has filed a claim under "Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatana Kalyan Yojna."
4. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, states that the claim of the petitioner has already been rejected on 13.02.2024. A copy of the order is directed to be provided to the learned counsel for the petitioner. The same has also been provided in Court.
5. This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order before the appropriate forum. December 18, 2025 Shubhankar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Sewak, Satyendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Shree Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench