Allahabad High Court
WRIA/14778/2025 of ASHOK KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES LKO. AND ANOTHER on 18 December 2025
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14778 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Heard Mr. Mohammad Hayan Hasan learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, order or
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14778 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Heard Mr. Mohammad Hayan Hasan learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order of suspension dated 04.12.2025 contained in Annexure-1 passed by the opposite party no.1 after summoning the original from the record of respondent no.1.
2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 04.12.2025 for instituting the inquiry contained in Anexure-2 to the writ petition passed by the opposite party no.1 after summoning the original from the record of respondent no.1.
3. Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.1 to allow the petitioner to work on the post on which he was working prior to passing the order of suspension.
4. Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay him full salary each and every month as and when it falls due." Learned counsel for petitioner on the basis of instructions submits that certain relevant pleadings and prayer were inadvertently omitted due to which he wishes to file afresh. Considering such prayer, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. December 18, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Hayan Hasan, Neel Kamal Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ashok Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Irrigation And Water Resources Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench